If you’re a business leader today you are working to understand and balance the perspectives of an unprecedented variety of stakeholders – from NGOs becoming more voracious in their demands to workers who are increasingly hard to engage – and doing so in a world that is more transparent and connected than ever before. It’s a tough challenge.
I found myself reflecting on this the other night as I sat down with two very smart people for one of those marvelous European dinners. Both are business leaders in one of the world’s great pharmaceutical companies. The conversation turned to the growing complexity of the business environment, and the question was inevitably posed: What had I, as a business professor, managed to figure out about what it takes to succeed under such conditions? In no particular order, here are my thoughts.
No
Illusions, Eyes Wide Open
Some 15 years ago my colleague Sumantra Ghoshal and I wrote business cases on
three companies that were then leaders in their sectors: BP, Royal Bank of
Scotland, and Nokia. In one way or another, and for rather different reasons,
all of these companies have since struggled. So my first observation is that
leaders must constantly acknowledge that their companies are subject to an
onslaught of destabilizing forces. Being vigilant and observant about the
nature and velocity of these forces is crucial. Effective leaders in complex
environments do not succumb to a belief in their invincibility – they keep
their eyes wide open to the reality of the world.
Authenticity,
Tempered by Custodial Responsibility
Over the course of the dinner, we arrived at the hot topic of authenticity.
Various proponents of this notion have urged leaders not to try to conform to a
narrow description of what a leader does, much less copy someone else’s style.
Leaders are urged to be themselves. Only those perceived to be authentic and
who are comfortable bringing their whole selves to work can gain others’ trust
and inspire them to pull together. It seems to me that this emphasis on
authenticity is an important counterbalance to earlier assumptions that people
gained leadership powers by dint of titles or positions in hierarchies. And it
certainly resonates with the world’s reverence for Steve Jobs, who created the
world’s number one brand while obstinately refusing to be anything but himself.
At the same time, growing complexity in the business environment creates a challenge. For people in organizations facing an external world of mounting chaos, being led by groups of highly idiosyncratic leaders, however authentic, could be confusing and distracting. In particular, when a leader is not a founder, he or she inherits a role as a custodian, and is entrusted with growing and passing on to future generations of employees and shareholders the value that past generations sowed. So yes, be authentic – but don’t break the mold so completely that others need to spend energy figuring out how to engage with your leadership. The world is complex enough without this further variable to be considered.
Strength
in Diverse, Collaborative Teams
Thinking again about the problems encountered by BP, RBS and Nokia in the past
decade, as different as they were, it’s possible to see a common factor. These
firms lacked diverse, highly collaborative leadership teams. At RBS, CEO Fred
Goodwin isolated himself from his colleagues, failed to listen to others, and
became increasingly selfish in his behavior. At Nokia, the senior leadership
team was for a long time extraordinarily homogenous (mostly men, mostly from
Finland, mostly software engineers, mostly educated in Helsinki). How likely
was it that they would be on top of the rapid developments in Asian consumer
markets, or in technology and design emanating from Silicon Valley? At BP, we
know top management found it difficult to integrate US assets and build
collaborative relationships with the leaders of US acquisitions – contributing
to a problem with implementing safety standards globally.
Simply put, as businesses are increasingly challenged by dynamic change and crises, it becomes ever more crucial for their leadership teams to have sufficient diversity to see what is happening from different perspectives, and sufficient collegiality to work collaboratively with each other even when under stress.
There is undoubtedly much more that could be said about leading well in complex business environments. Indeed, in a conference next month – the Global Drucker Forum, in the wonderful city of Vienna – I’ll be participating in a bigger conversation. There will be more smart people seeking answers they can take back to their organizations. Together, we’ll make the way forward for leadership a little clearer. And with luck, there will be time for coffee and streudel.